<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>LeafLabs Garden &#187; Topic: OpenMoko making USB product ids available to open hardware projects</title>
		<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=1781</link>
		<description>A place to share, learn, and grow...</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://forums.leaflabs.com/rss.php?topic=1781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>bnewbold on "OpenMoko making USB product ids available to open hardware projects"</title>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=1781#post-10819</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bnewbold</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">10819@http://forums.leaflabs.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;See: &#60;a href=&#34;http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/USB_Product_IDs&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/USB_Product_IDs&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is really great news, an issue i've been agitating about for a while now. The current system &#34;requires&#34; companies to pay in $2000+ to get a legit vendor id block of 65536 product ids, even if only a handful of product ids are needed. Some chip vendors help out (I think you can get msp430 IDs for free if you ask nicely), but there hasn't been a systematic way for small (for-profit or non-profit) projects to get a legit ID.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;They are also making ethernet MAC addresses available.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I hope in the future these blocks can be turned over to a group like the Open Hardware Association to be maintained in the long run. It's a sham and a shame that these industry groups are always structured around setting up these artificial financial barriers to entry; surely reasonable administrative overhead costs ($120k a year?) could be covered by donations from larger companies or a government/foundation grant. See also recent efforts to publish expensive copyrighted standards on the (ethical) grounds that they are effectively a subset of US federal law.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
