<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>LeafLabs Garden &#187; Topic: Connectome and how could open source hardware make use of one?</title>
		<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=1494</link>
		<description>A place to share, learn, and grow...</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://forums.leaflabs.com/rss.php?topic=1494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>gbulmer on "Connectome and how could open source hardware make use of one?"</title>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=1494#post-9896</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gbulmer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9896@http://forums.leaflabs.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hard to say without details about what software they need to run. A neuron is so simple that I can't imagine needing anything as complex as a a real OS. I could imagine them having a TCP/IP stack (maybe just UDP which would allow broadcast and topic based routing)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I do remember years ago someone doing an experiment where they put, I think, 1000 MIPS processors (comparable to ARM) on a single chip.&#60;br /&#62;
IBM have all the technology and their own processor designs to do that sort of thing.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I believe folks have put 32+ 32-bit processors on a single FPGA (e.g. micro Blaze &#60;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze)&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze)&#60;/a&#62;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I don't think 32-bit processors are essential. There was a machine called the connection machine &#60;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_Machine&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_Machine&#60;/a&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
which used processor which were 1-bit serial.&#60;br /&#62;
I'm not convinced its trade off of width vs clock was ideal, but a modern FPGA has 'cells' which are not too much simpler, so you could expect to have 10,000's of cells on a single FPGA.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;With enough on-board RAM to hold the &#34;program&#34;, then there would  be enough to do the worm, and more.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>josheeg on "Connectome and how could open source hardware make use of one?"</title>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=1494#post-9852</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>josheeg</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9852@http://forums.leaflabs.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Connectome and how could open source hardware make use of one?&#60;br /&#62;
I seen ted talks on connectome and a ted talks on IBM blue brain.&#60;br /&#62;
That made me wonder linux has clustering distributions that go on sd cards.&#60;br /&#62;
IBMs blue brain runs some kind of connectome structure by putting 1000 artificial neurons in eatch processor of 4 refrigerator sized boxes of networked not soo large processors 16000 of them to run a neocortical column simulation.&#60;br /&#62;
Hypotheticaly would linux be neeeded for a system like that or could maple and a fpga be one node of that system? Would it be larger and not require as many? Or would it be better suited for something like a arm8 in the beagle bone? Would it be better as pannels of processors hard wired with wires or wireless chips?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
