<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>LeafLabs Garden &#187; Topic: Possibility of porting the Maple libraries for the TI Stellaris EVALBOT?</title>
		<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=621</link>
		<description>A place to share, learn, and grow...</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://forums.leaflabs.com/rss.php?topic=621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>gbulmer on "Possibility of porting the Maple libraries for the TI Stellaris EVALBOT?"</title>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=621#post-3461</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gbulmer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3461@http://forums.leaflabs.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;AFAIK, those Stellaris processors are exactly Cortex-M3, so the GCC toolchain, which generates Thumb-2 code, will work.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I would expect Maple (STM32F103) to Stellaris to be less effort than Arduino to Stellaris.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;BUT, the peripherals are where all of the variability between manufacturers happens, so I would plan to read both sets of processor manuals (for the peripherals) to understand the differences.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;You might start with the ARM CMSIS for Stellaris
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>soundcyst on "Possibility of porting the Maple libraries for the TI Stellaris EVALBOT?"</title>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=621#post-3454</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>soundcyst</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3454@http://forums.leaflabs.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;if the stellaris toolchain uses gcc-arm, it shouldn't be too tricky, though the memory map of the stellaris will probably differ from the stm32, so that could be a bit of a headache.. nothing a little busy work with the datasheets won't cure though..&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;your biggest hurdle might be finding others willing to help out, since, afaik, the stellaris still hasn't hit full production yet. (so much for 4Q2010)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;i would be interested in trying it out, though.. i think one of my local hackerspaces has some of the chips / dev boards.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crenn on "Possibility of porting the Maple libraries for the TI Stellaris EVALBOT?"</title>
			<link>http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=621#post-3453</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>crenn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3453@http://forums.leaflabs.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I finally received my TI Stellaris EVALBOT when I ordered it in october last year after I saw a HaD article about a coupon giving $125 off a normally $150 kit (see Link: &#60;a href=&#34;http://hackaday.com/2010/10/04/125-off-the-evalbot-is-a-steal/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://hackaday.com/2010/10/04/125-off-the-evalbot-is-a-steal/&#60;/a&#62; ) and I had a similar thought when I ordered it that it might be possible to port the Maple libaries to the EVALBOT (It uses a TI LM3S9B92 ARM processor) without too much hassle (although I haven't worked with 'raw' ARM processors before, so far it's either been via an OS (I have a 200MHz ARM NAS) or via Maple.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What are other people's thoughts on this?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
