http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=241 A place to share, learn, and grow... en-US Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:12:35 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://forums.leaflabs.com/search.php http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=241#post-1932 Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:26:41 +0000 leaflabsandy 1932@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Quote: "I am not sure exactly which hooks you would like on Systick(). Please do let us know other features on your minds." </p> <p>Reply:<br /> From x893 modifications to systick:<br /> <a href="http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=221&amp;page=2" rel="nofollow">http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=221&amp;page=2</a> </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=241#post-1893 Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:39:14 +0000 poslathian 1893@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Regarding the systick - feel free to include systick.h and use it! Be aware that micros() is dependent on it, so you will loose micros if you disable systick(). </p> <p>On Maple 0.1.0 - The python based IDE is surprisingly mature, were gearing up to release it. But not before doing a 0.0.9 with your features labelled A,B and C. </p> <p>In terms of D, are you referring to external interrupts? In that case, then D as well. </p> <p>The Python version, has MAJOR fixes to the way the output of GCC (and ld, od, ar, etc.) is parsed. So beyond just better reporting of actual binary sizes, a far more functional error identification in the IDE is expected (you may have noticed being shown the wrong line during error reporting). </p> <p>I am not sure exactly which hooks you would like on Systick(). Please do let us know other features on your minds. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=241#post-1843 Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:05:45 +0000 leaflabsandy 1843@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Need to bump this. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=241#post-1770 Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:54:07 +0000 josheeg 1770@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>I like the idea of prereleases instead of throwing the developers relese to the public. </p> <p>For example consider the time saved if everyone who wants a simple sketch to work posts to the forum because the lastest revision has a small bug. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=241#post-1767 Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:41:05 +0000 leaflabsandy 1767@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Shouldn't there be a "pre-stable" IDE release of 0.0.9 in mid Oct.?</p> <p>Merriam-Webster: Stable(adj) not changing or fluctuating<br /> steady in purpose: firm in resolution</p> <p>Leaflabs is going to release a stable release 0.1.0?</p> <p>I didn't think there were any MIT riverboat gamblers on the St. Charles river until now? (A joke)</p> <p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /> Projected tasks scheduled for completion for stable IDE release of 0.1.0. ????</p> <p>#1. New and improved (on grid) printed circuit board Maple rev. 5.</p> <p>#2. Complete new rewrite of the IDE (in python) &lt;--- this will be stable?</p> <p>#3. True resource(s) indication used on compile eg flash and ram used.</p> <p>#4. The new version to be released as 0.1.0; expect it to have ports for the last<br /> remaining unimplemented Arduino core language functionality.</p> <p> A. PulseIn, Tone, NoTone<br /> B. I2C re-write from soft I2C to hardware I2C DMA. &lt;--- this will be stable?<br /> C. Serial ports (DMA)<br /> D. Interrupt completion</p> <p>#5. Minor bug fixes.</p> <p>#6. Possible hook addition for systick (from x893) for RTOS(s) MapleCoOS and MapleFreeRTOS</p> <p> Note: In release 0.0.7 - Libmaple support for enabling and disabling the SysTick timer<br /> via systick_disable() and systick_resume() in systick.h. If you are using a RTOS you<br /> should not use these commands?<br /> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>Any thoughts? </p>