http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220 A place to share, learn, and grow... en-US Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:13:39 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://forums.leaflabs.com/search.php http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-12472 Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:09:27 +0000 feurig 12472@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>mbolivar,</p> <p>This is getting more important as the new include style is breaking the libraries that we are trying to port to both the ide and libmaple. (crenn and I are trying to work on the maple-sdfat libary and are running into this already).</p> <p>I will try to figure out an approach.</p> <p>ps. why don't you ever hang in the channel any more :)</p> <p>Don. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-12452 Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:53:22 +0000 mbolivar 12452@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Thanks!</p> <p>I think something like <code>git describe</code> might be of use here. (Or <code>git describe --tags</code> for now, as I didn't use signed tags for v0.0.10-v0.0.12. I will use a signed tag for the next release.) </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-12435 Wed, 15 Aug 2012 02:00:07 +0000 feurig 12435@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Mbolivar. Didnt see the patch request. I will put this on my todo list. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-11885 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:23:37 +0000 mbolivar 11885@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <blockquote><p> __LIBMAPLE__ macro and a __LIBMAPLE_VERSION__ version so we could behave appropriately.</p> </blockquote> <p>agree. care to submit a patch? i think the linux kernel uses some git-fu to make this all work out even for development versions.</p> <blockquote><p> STM_32MCU_SERIES to MCU_SERIES, allowing ARMs from other manufacturers.</p> </blockquote> <p>disagree. i'd rather have something like a <code>LIBMAPLE_MCU_MANUFACTURER</code>, taking values like <code>LIBMAPLE_MCU_MANUFACTURER_ST</code>, etc., so that you could organize the conditional compilation in a tree. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-11883 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:27:19 +0000 Anonymous 11883@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>@feurig</p> <p>I think it's cool!</p> <p>However, I do not know there is a restriction of the Maple project to other ARM processors, if no restrictions, it is interesting that the macro is changed from STM_32MCU_SERIES to MCU_SERIES, allowing ARMs from other manufacturers. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-11871 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:54:02 +0000 feurig 11871@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>The last word I got when I asked this question was to use the board defines. The STM_32MCU_SERIES is what made more sense to me since it covers all of the existing leaflabs boards and boards like the olimexino. It would be nice if there were a __LIBMAPLE__ macro and a __LIBMAPLE_VERSION__ version so we could behave appropriately. They are probably putting this off until the wiring merge. </p> http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=2220#post-11868 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:28:50 +0000 Anonymous 11868@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>Hello all.</p> <p>in order to adapt some of the Arduino libraries for the Maple I need to identify what the Board used.</p> <p>In avr-gcc there are some macros that do this for example:</p> <p>__AVR_ATmega328, AVR_ATmega2560, __ AVR__, and _BOARD_UNO_ _BOARD_MEGA_</p> <p>Can not find the equivalent macros MAPLE, something that can tell me __ ARM__, _BOARD_MAPLE, I have found a macro that I could say STM32_MCU_SERIES (comparing it equals STM32_SERIES_F1 _F2 OR ...) but does not believe is what I want.</p> <p>Where can I find information for it.</p> <p>Grateful for any guidance </p>