http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=158 A place to share, learn, and grow... en-US Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:19:48 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://forums.leaflabs.com/search.php http://forums.leaflabs.com/topic.php?id=158#post-1011 Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:23:20 +0000 Adam 1011@http://forums.leaflabs.com/ <p>I did a few quick performance tests this afternoon on the WiShield, comparing Arduino and Maple. </p> <p>Here are the results:</p> <p>I used a 1030 byte file, and test runs of about 5 minutes.</p> <p>Arduino, stock stack uIP buffer set to default 400 bytes:<br /> 17 transactions per second</p> <p>Maple, stock iperry port, uIP buffer set to default 400 bytes:<br /> 18.4 transactions per second</p> <p>Maple, iperry port, uIP buffer set to 1500 bytes:<br /> 30.4 transactions per second</p> <p>. . . . </p> <p>For the Arduino, I used the stock stack from AsyncLabs:</p> <p><a href="http://github.com/asynclabs/WiShield" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/asynclabs/WiShield</a></p> <p>For the Maple, I used Perry Hung's port of the AsyncLabs stack:</p> <p><a href="http://github.com/iperry/maple-library/tree/wishield-dev" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/iperry/maple-library/tree/wishield-dev</a></p> <p>The performance test setup was Grinder (<a href="http://grinder.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://grinder.sourceforge.net/</a>) using an adapted http.py script that did not save the downloaded pages.</p> <p>I would like the stack to be even faster, but some initial experiments with increasing the number of connections did not result in faster speeds. </p>